Sensitive to Small Moves
Fire. Running water. Wind through trees.
We can stare at them for hours and not know why. Something holds us there. I think I know what we’re actually looking at.
In chaos theory, systems following deterministic rules can become wildly sensitive to tiny differences in starting conditions. Two leaves drop into the same stream, inches apart. One washes up on the left bank. The other travels two miles downstream and gets caught in a drain. Same water. Same rules. Completely different destinations.
This property has a name in physics. I want to give it a name in life.
Liminal sensitivity. The moments when your trajectory is most responsive to small inputs. When the old structure has dissolved and the new one hasn’t formed yet. When a single conversation, a single “yes,” a single person can bend the entire arc of what comes next.
Most people run from these moments. The ones who change are the ones who stay.
In 1961, Edward Lorenz was running weather simulations at MIT. He re-entered a starting value as 0.506 instead of 0.506127. Tiny difference. Three decimal places. The simulation produced a completely different weather pattern. Not a small deviation. A different world.
He called it sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The public called it the butterfly effect. Most people think that’s a metaphor. It’s not. It’s a mathematical property of deterministic systems. The rules are fixed. The outcomes are not. Past a certain horizon, prediction becomes impossible. Not because the system is random. Because it is exquisitely, structurally sensitive.
This isn’t a physics essay. This is about when it happens to you.
There’s a word anthropologists use for the space between. Liminality. From the Latin limen: threshold. The doorway. You’re not in the old room anymore. You’re not in the new one yet. You’re standing in the frame.
No label. No title. No clean answer to “what do you do?”
This is when your life becomes a chaotic system.
When you’re stable, your trajectory is locked. Job, identity, routine, paycheck, address. You’re a boulder rolling downhill. Massive inertia. A conversation can’t move you. A chance meeting can’t redirect you. Small inputs bounce off. The path is set.
But in the liminal phase, you’re a leaf in a stream. Everything is sensitive. One conversation changes a career. One meeting changes a city. One “yes” to something that makes no sense rewrites the next five years.
The math is the same. The system is the same. The difference is where you are in it.
Most people hate liminal space. The ambiguity. The not-knowing. The way it makes your chest tight at 2 AM when you can’t explain your life in a sentence.
So they skip it.
Stable job to stable job. Known identity to known identity. One relationship into the next without breathing. They grab the first thing that looks like solid ground and hold on.
This is why most people never really change. Not because they lack talent. Not because they lack opportunity. Because they collapse the uncertainty before chaos can do its work. They exit the doorway before the sensitivity peaks.
This pattern repeats across careers, relationships, cities, companies. The people who transform are never the ones who made the safest move. They’re the ones who tolerated the liminal space long enough for a small input to find them.
A cannabis venture that went nowhere. Months of work, connections, planning. It didn’t fail. It just didn’t converge. At the time it felt like wasted motion. Looking back: a data point. A calibration.
A company with Sharique, my best friend since we were kids. By December 2024, we were two weeks from dead. Burn rate eating through what was left. No clear path forward. Pure liminal space. Every instinct screaming to grab something stable.
Then a single meeting. Ben van Sprundel. One conversation that didn’t just save the company. It changed the city we operated in. It changed who we were building for. It changed everything downstream in ways we couldn’t have predicted and didn’t try to.
One “yes” to something that made no sense at the time. One small move during maximum sensitivity.
Steve Jobs said you can’t connect the dots looking forward. Chaos theory says the same thing, but with math. The dots connect into shapes you never would have drawn on purpose. You only see the pattern from the other side.
Here’s the thing about chaotic systems. Even the wildly unpredictable ones orbit around certain shapes. In physics, these are called strange attractors. Plot a chaotic system over time and it looks like noise at any given moment. Zoom out, and the shape is unmistakable. A butterfly wing. A spiral. A pattern that was always there but invisible from inside any single loop.
Five years of apparent noise. Failed ventures. Dead-end projects. Cities that didn’t work out. Ideas that landed nowhere.
But orbiting the same things the entire time. Building. Operating. Solving problems for real people. Getting obsessed with how things actually work, not how they’re supposed to work on paper.
The attractor was always there. You just can’t see it from inside the doorway. You have to trust that the orbit has a shape even when every data point feels random. Because it does. The math guarantees it.
This isn’t philosophy. It’s operating strategy.
Liminal phases are rare. Most of life is the stable part, the boulder rolling, the locked trajectory. But when you’re in one, the rules change. Small moves compound harder than they ever will during stable phases. The sensitivity is real and it’s temporary.
Which means three things:
Freezing is the worst response. You’re wasting the only period where small inputs actually matter. Sitting still during maximum sensitivity is like having the wind at your back and refusing to move.
Grabbing the first exit collapses optionality. The desperate lunge for stability feels like progress. It’s not. It’s choosing a trajectory before the system has shown you where it wants to go. You lock in too early and spend years course-correcting from a premature decision.
Staying open is the strategy. Saying yes to things that don’t make sense yet. Talking to people outside your current world. Making small moves in directions you can’t fully justify. Not because you’re being reckless. Because you understand that during liminal sensitivity, the small move that changes everything won’t announce itself. It’ll look like a normal Tuesday.
The fire. The running water. The wind.
Maybe we stare because they’re mirrors. Constant transition. Constant sensitivity. Movement that never settles but holds a shape over time. Chaos that isn’t chaos at all, but a system too complex to read from the inside.
The liminal space isn’t the gap between your real life. It is your real life. The doorway isn’t the obstacle. It’s the instrument.
Chaos isn’t the enemy. It’s the operating system.
Stay there a little longer than feels comfortable.